Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 267 Ind. 51 - Brannum v. State

Brannum v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

89
cited by 89 later decisions
1
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

83 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 89 later decisions — most recently May 2015 · most notably Jacks v. State (1979), Rogers v. State (1979)

83 state decisions

45019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kennedy v. State · Aszman v. State · McCoy v. State · Butler v. State · Kelley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 89 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"A jury of laymen will often have an awesome respect for the institution of the American trial judge. This can lead them to accord great and perhaps decisive significance to the judge's every word and intimation. It is therefore essential that the judge refrain from any actions indicating any position other than strict impartial, ity."”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “We must state again that in order for the criminal justice system to survive, our courts must be forums in which all parties can receive a fair and impartial trial. Impartiality insures that persons guilty of crimes be convicted and punished, and that innocence be likewise determined.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “By giving the special instruction sua sponte, however, the court emphasized this provision as one of primary importance to the jury, and tended to tell them what they ought to do. It is fundamental that a court should not, by an instruction, cast suspicion on any defense or evidence offered.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.