State v. Slater’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 77 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 79 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably Martin v. Kansas Department of Revenue (2008), 38 Cal. 4th 1078 - People v. Wells (2006)
2 federal appellate · 77 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Hensley · Wright v. Kansas Water Office · State v. Wonders · 19 Kan. App. 2d 920 - State v. Tucker · State Ex Rel. Taxation & Revenue Department Motor Vehicle Division v. Van Ruiten
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A law enforcement officer may stop any person in a public place based upon specific and articulable facts raising a reasonable suspicion that such person has committed or is about to commit a crime.” “Reasonable suspicion is a less demanding standard than probable cause, not only in the sense that reasonable suspicion can be established with information that is different in quantity or content than that required to establish probable cause, but also in the sense drat reasonable suspicion can arise from information diat is less reliable than that required to show probable cause. Reasonable suspicion, like probable cause, is dependent upon both the content of information possessed by police and its degree of reliability. Bodi factors, quantity and quality, are considered in the totality of the circumstances that must be taken into account when evaluating whedier reasonable suspicion exists.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“Second on the scale of reliability are those tips in which, although the informant does not identify himself or herself, the informant gives enough information that his or her identity may be ascertained. This occurs where the informant states that he or she is calling from his or her place of business, or where the informant in person makes contact with the police officer. In such cases, courts generally find such a tip to be reliable”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent““The question raised by this appeal is whether the anonymous tip of a ‘possible drunk driver’ at a specific location, together with a specific description of the vehicle, license tag number, and address of the registered owner is alone sufficient to provide an articulable and reasonable suspicion that a crime is being committed.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.