State v. Schulze’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
October 2014
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Ruff · State v. Buckner · State v. Mountjoy · 13 Kan. App. 2d 417 - State v. Hinckley · City of Overland Park v. Cunningham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The purpose of permitting the State to appeal a question reserved is to allow the prosecution to obtain review of an adverse legal ruling on an issue of statewide interest important to the correct and uniform administration of the criminal law which otherwise would not be subject to appellate review.” State v. Schulze, 267 Kan. 749 , Syl. ¶ 1, 985 P.2d 1169 (1999).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Shively“that compelling financial circumstances existed which necessitated relief from the sizable bill.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Schulze's evidence of his financial difficulties”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.