State v. McCray’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
2 district · 57 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably Pulley v. State (1980), First Federated Commodity Trust Corp. v. Commissioner of Securities (1974)
2 district · 57 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Monroe v. Pape · Robinson v. State of California · Price v. Johnston · Cooper v. Pate · Georgia v. Wenger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We take judicial notice that the Commission is now fully operative. It began operation upon the appointment of an Executive Director on 30 November 1971. Rules and Regulations implementing Code, Art. 41, § 204F were adopted. Public Safety and Correctional Services, 12.07.00.00.-12.-07.00.05. The first hearing session was held on 17 December 1971 and hearings have been held continually since that time. Almost 600 complaints have been received from inmates and about 100 orders issued. The complaints and the disposition of them are open to public inspection pursuant to Code, Art. 41, § 204F(i). [ 267 Md. at 144 n. 27, 297 A.2d at 283 ].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McCray v. Burrell“We think that the Inmate Grievance Commission Act and the implementing rules adopted by the Commission provide “a simple and workable procedure by which every person in confinement who has, or thinks he has, a grievance or complaint can be heard promptly, fairly, and fully,” and obtain a judicial review with respect to his constitutional and statutory rights. [ 267 Md. at 144 , 297 A.2d at 282 . (Emphasis added)].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McCray v. Burrell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.