Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 267 N.C. 735 - Saunders v. Warren

Saunders v. Warren’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
March 1994
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently March 1994 · most notably Investment Properties of Asheville, Inc. v. Norburn (1972), Potts v. Howser (1968)

30 state decisions

1601966197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lewis v. . Watson · Brannon v. Ellis · State v. Sutton · Smith v. . Kappas · Hunton v. California Portland Cement Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`So the driver of the stopped vehicle must take such precautions as would reasonably be calculated to prevent injury, whether by the use of lights, flags, guards, or other practical means, and failing to give such warning may constitute negligence'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The decisions of this Court are consistently to the effect that G.S. 1-180 imposes upon the trial judge the positive duty of declaring and explaining the law arising on the evidence as to all substantial features of the case. A mere declaration of the law in general terms and a statement of the contentions of the parties with respect to a particular issue is not sufficient to meet the requirements of the statute. The judge must explain and apply the law to the specific facts pertinent to the issue involved.” Saunders v. Warren, 267 N.C. 735, 739 , 149 S.E. 2d 19 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.