State v. K. M.’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"At the time the person alleged to have a mental illness is brought before the court, the court shall advise the person of the following: "(a) The reason for being brought before the court; "(b) The nature of the proceedings; "(c) The possible results of the proceedings; "(d) The right to subpoena witnesses; and "(e) The person's rights regarding representation by or appointment of counsel."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“failure to provide a person with all of the information required by ORS 426.100(1) constitutes an egregious error that justifies plain error review”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(e) The person's rights regarding representation by or appointment of counsel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.