State v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[a] drug-detection dog detects the presence of drugs, not whether a person is intoxicated.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 295 Or. App. 769 - State v. Rondeau · 297 Or. App. 384 - State v. Williams

2. “cannot be supported as reasonably related to [the officer's] suspicion of DUII.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 295 Or. App. 769 - State v. Rondeau · 297 Or. App. 384 - State v. Williams

3. “a distinct question from whether present intoxication can support an objectively reasonable suspicion that a suspect previously possessed drugs, i.e. , immediately before consuming them. The reasonableness of that inference, however, is not at issue here.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 297 Or. App. 384 - State v. Williams