Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

267 P.2d 1012

Holladay v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · decided 1954-01-06

Relies on 55 Okla. Crim. 28 - Jacobs v. State · 54 Okla. Crim. 95 - Harrison v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1954-01-06

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 1983

5 state decisions

201954196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1On Petition for Rehearing

BRETT, Judge.

¶2On petition for rehearing and oral argument the same is denied; but the court is of the opinion that the sentences herein imposed are probably excessive, and the same are accordingly reduced in Cases No. 4058 and 4059 from three years to eighteen months. Since the original judgments provided that the sentences would run concurrently said eighteen months’ sentences will run concurrently. Harrison v. State, 54 Okl.Cr. 95, 14 P.2d 953; Jacobs v. State, 55 Okl.Cr. 28, 24 P.2d 295.

¶3POWELL, P. J., and JONES, J., concur.

/267/p2d/1012 · .json · Public domain