Igo v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1954
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently October 1988
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 59 Okla. Crim. 146 - Kennamer v. State · 94 Okla. Crim. 110 - Hathcox v. State · 95 Okla. Crim. 131 - Williams v. State · 72 Okla. Crim. 1 - Murphy v. State · 64 Cal. App. 474 - Grillich v. Weinshenk
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where a defendant is charged with the crime of murder, it is the duty of the trial court to instruct on the law of manslaughter in the first or second degree, if there is any evidence that the alleged crime might have been committed under circumstances that would reduce the crime from murder to manslaughter, and this is true whether the evidence comes from witnesses produced by the State or by the accused, or by both.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Beaman · Williams v. State“"The extent of cross examination with respect to an appropriate subject rests in the sound discretion of the trial court, and it is only in cases of clear abuse of such discretion, resulting in manifest prejudice to the accused, that this court will cause a reversal of the case."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Farmer v. State · Flowers v. State““. . . a prosecuting attorney may state his opinion as to the defendant’s guilt when he also states that his opinion is based on the evidence in the case, and where the evidence detailed reasonably tends to support such conclusions”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Walker v. State · Grist v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.