Easterling v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1954
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1973
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 94 Okla. Crim. 110 - Hathcox v. State · 96 Okla. Crim. 137 - Wilson v. State · 12 Okla. Crim. 417 - Gransden v. State · 39 Okla. Crim. 383 - Lemmons v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * Mrs. Bond testified that she heard her say, 'Gene, you don’t know how to fight, all you know how to do is just pull hair’ — - “By Mr. Wadlington: That is not in the record in this case. “By Mr. Ward: Do what? “By the Court: I believe that you are confusing that with the other. I don’t believe she testified about that— “By' Mr. Ward: Ño, sir — she did, she testified that ‘all he did was to know how to pull hair’ — - “By the Court: Well, the jury remembers what she testified about.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Easterling v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.