Littke v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1954
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 95 Okla. Crim. 131 - Williams v. State · 92 Okla. Crim. 267 - King v. State · 97 Okla. Crim. 78 - Littke v. State · 94 Okla. Crim. 291 - McMillin v. State · 94 Okla. Crim. 180 - Barnett v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A search warrant must so particularly describe the place to be searched that the officer to whom it is directed may determine the place from the war rant, leaving no discretion as to the place to be searched. “Where a search warrant describes premises upon which are located more than one house in which persons reside other than the accused, the same is what the law denominates a blanket warrant, and is ordinarily insufficient in law to sustain a search.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Linde v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.