Walker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
March 2023
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Graham v. United States · Gleason v. State · Mazurek v. State · Compton v. State · Olsen v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“provide the jury with a foundational legal understanding to enable a reasoned application of the facts to the law.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“I have lost count of how many times this jury was instructed that all of those incidents in 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 were only for a limited purpose. They can be used by you for the purpose of establishing course of conduct, only. One piece of all the elements that the State has to prove. This case is about March 20, 2010.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(b) Unless otherwise provided by law, a person commits the crime of stalking if with intent to harass another person, the person engages in a course of conduct reasonably likely to harass that person, including but not limited to any combination of the following: [[Image here]]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.