267 Pa. Super. 46 - Commonwealth v. Crowson’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 223 Pa. Super. 60 - Commonwealth v. Lockhart · 247 Pa. Super. 373 - Commonwealth v. Jacobs · 261 Pa. Super. 92 - Commonwealth v. Moore · State v. Keys · 256 Pa. Super. 111 - Commonwealth v. Nutter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“requirements, presume that the offender must have the intent to commit a crime within the entered structure. See, generally, Annot: Burglary”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Arne“no evidence that [the defendant] entered the . . . residence surreptitiously or by force”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“no evidence at all regarding the manner of entry by appellant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.