Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 267 So. 2d 102 - State v. Spanierman

267 So. 2d 102 - State v. Spanierman’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
May 1994
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 1994

15 state decisions

120197219801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Wong Sun v. United States · Wilson v. Porter · Longo v. State · United States v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In any case, even if it be assumed that the officer had no right to stop the van under any theory, a valid search and subsequent seizure may nevertheless be predicated upon a free and voluntary consent; provided, however, that such consent was not obtained by the exploitation of any prior unlawful actions of the officer.3 A finding of a voluntary con- “3. See, Wong Sun v. United States (1903), 371 U.S. 471, at p. 488 , 83 S.Ct. 407 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441 . See, also, Davis v. California (9th Cir. 1965), 341 F.2d 982 . sent, therefore, might well have obviated any question of an illegal stopping or arrest.4 “4. See, Longo v. State (1946) [ 157 Fla. 668 ], 26 So.2d 818 , and State v. Custer (Fla.App.1971), 251 So.2d 287 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"Advising one of his right of refusal to consent to a search is not required to validate that consent or to prima facie establish the voluntariness thereof."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.