Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 267 So. 2d 73 - Sacks v. Sacks

267 So. 2d 73 - Sacks v. Sacks’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
3
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2018

18 state decisions

6019721980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pinkerton-Hays Lumber Company v. Pope · Eldridge v. Eldridge · Gossett v. Ullendorff · 137 So. 2d 563 - McBurnette v. Playground Equipment Corp. · 258 So. 2d 815 - Spivey v. Battaglia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The courts of this State have created a strong presumption in favor of legitimacy to protect the interests of the child when the child was either born or conceived in wedlock. Gossett v. Ullendorff, 114 Fla. 159 , 154 So. 177 (1934), and Eldridge v. Eldridge, 153 Fla. 873 , 16 So.2d 163 (1944). This presumption as noted above was created to protect the welfare of the child. To now utilize this same presumption to deny this child support is to destroy the very reason for its existence. The welfare of the child demands that we recognize and honor not the fiction, but the underlying purpose upon which the fiction was created." (Emphasis supplied)”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The child's welfare is paramount. Too often this is forgotten.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.