Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

267 So. 3d 534

Donley v. State

Decided March 28, 2019

Relies on Tompkins v. State

Decided 2019-03-28

Per Curiam.

¶1Petitioner has filed a pro se petition for belated appeal following his conviction for trafficking in opium. To the extent Petitioner alleges ineffective assistance of appellate counsel on direct appeal, the petition *535is dismissed as untimely. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(d)(5). To the extent Petitioner complains about actions taken by counsel during postconviction proceedings, the petition is denied. SeeTompkins v. State , 994 So.2d 1072, 1088 (Fla. 2008) (noting that claims of ineffective assistance of postconviction counsel are not cognizable).

¶2Roberts, Ray, and Jay, JJ., concur.

/267/so3d/534 · .json · Public domain