Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 267 SW2D 531 - Commonwealth v. Moore

Commonwealth v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 1963
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lehman v. Williams · Breathitt County v. Hudson · Commonwealth v. Gilbert · Keck v. Hafley · Chesapeake & Ohio Railway v. Blankenship

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is our opinion that the damage caused to appellees was of a consequential nature incident to the prudent and proper exercise of the Commonwealth’s right to use the property it acquired for highway purposes. It did not constitute a new taking of their property and consequently they should not have been permitted to recover compensation in these actions.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.