Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

267 S.W.2d 836

Hughes v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1954-05-12

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 1965

3 state decisions

Relies on 54 Tex. Crim. 434 - Hinman v. State · Poston v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1954-05-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BELCHER, Commissioner.

¶1 The former appeal of this case, Hughes v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 262 S.W.2d 506, was dismissed because no sentence appeared to have been pronounced against appellant.

¶2 This record shows that sentence was pronounced upon appellant while the above appeal was pending in this court. The trial court is without authority to enter a sentence during the pendency of an appeal. Therefore, no legal sentence áp-pearing in the record, it is the duty of this court to again dismiss the appeal. Le Bove v. State, 146 Tex.Cr.R. 157, 172 S.W.2d 342, and authorities therein cited.

¶3 After this appeal has become final, the trial court would be authorized to enter the proper sentence. Arts. 828, 772, C.C.P.; Hinman v. State, 54 Tex.Cr.R. 434, 113 S.W. 280.

¶4 The appeal is dismissed.

¶5 Opinion approved by the Court

/267/sw2d/836 · .json · Public domain