Barkley v. Wallace’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Tarmac Mid-Atlantic, Inc. v. Smiley Block Co. · Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. Dungee · Holles v. Sunrise Terrace, Inc. · McNeir v. Greer-Hale Chinchilla Ranch · Velocity Express Mid-Atlantic, Inc. v. Hugen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(citation omitted)); Barkley v. Wallace, 267 Va. 369, 373 , 595 S.E.2d 271, 273 (2004) (“Eveiy fact that tends to establish the probability or improbability of a fact at issue is relevant.”); Velocity Express Mid-Atlantic v. Hugen, 266 Va. 188, 205 , 585 S.E.2d 557, 566-67 (2003) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In a civil case, the erroneous exclusion of evidence is reversible error when the record fails to show plainly that the excluded evidence could not have affected the verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Thus, we consider the potential effect of the excluded evidence in light of all the evidence that was presented to the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.