Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 267 Va. 591 - Dandridge v. Marshall

Dandridge v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on McMunn v. Tatum · Lombard v. Rohrbaugh · Spence v. Miller · Breeding, Adm'r v. Johnson · Washington-Virginia Railway Co. v. Deahl

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “determining whether relevant evidence should be admitted, the trial court must apply a balancing test to assess the probative value of the evidence and any undue prejudicial effect of that evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.