Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 268 ALA 50 - Wright v. Pickens County

Wright v. Pickens County’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 1985
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mitchell v. Hammond · Ensley Motor Car Co. v. O'Rear · Bentley v. County Commission for Russell County · Curjel v. Ash · Pruett v. Las Vegas, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"`In the location, erection, repair, or removal, or in the furnishing of the county's buildings, bridges, and roads, the court of county commissioners or board of revenue have a discretion that cannot be exercised for them by any other county official, or directed by any court, except only when their acts are such as amount to fraud, corruption, or unfair dealing. In the performance of these statutory duties, boards of revenue and courts of county commissioners exercise a function that is quasi legislative. * * In Town of Eutaw v. Coleman , [ 189 Ala. 164 , 66 So. 464 ], this court said: "We are not dealing with any question of the advisability of what the commissioners have done. There is no charge of fraud, corruption, or unfair dealing, and, in the absence of some such charge, this court is committed to the doctrine that in no case involving the exercise of discretionary power by the court of county commissioners will their action be controlled by any judicial tribunal."'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"The powers of courts of county commissioners with regard to public roads are prescribed in § 43, Tit. 23, Code 1940 [the predecessor of § 23-1-80 ]. . . . "It has been held that the exercise of the discretionary power given to the boards mentioned in § 43 cannot `be restrained or reviewed, unless it has been in a fraudulent, corrupt, or unfair conduct of the business of the county.' Ensley Motor Car Co. v. O'Rear , 196 Ala. 481 , [485], 71 So. 704, 705 ; Bentley v. County Commission for Russell County , 264 Ala. 106 , 109 , 84 So.2d 490 , 493 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “When the question of the need for a public road is involved, the law commits this to the county authorities. The matter of the creation or discontinuance of a public road is legislative. The legislative body may and should consider all factors, the public need and convenience, the expense of the road system, the hazards and expense of frequent grade crossings over railroads, etc.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.