Boyles v. Boyles’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
86 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 86 later decisions — most recently September 2025 · most notably Moore v. Moore (2016), Kuchmas v. Kuchmas (2006)
86 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State Bank · Orr v. Orr · Bates v. Bodie · Wood v. Wood · Sweeney v. Sweeney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[1] the financial circumstances of both parties, [2] the couple’s past standard of living, [3] the value of joindy owned property, [4] the amount and nature of the income, both current and anticipated, of both husband and wife, [5] the extent and nature of the resources and assets of each of the parties, [6] the amount of income of each that is “spendable,” available to each of the parties for the payment of living expenses, [7] the earning ability and capacity of both husband and wife, [ 8 ] property awarded or given to one of the parties, either by the court or the other party, [9] the disposition made of the homestead or jointly owned property, [10] the condition of health and medical needs of both husband and wife, [11] the duration of the marriage, [12] the amount of child support. (citations omitted)”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“a continuous allotment of sums, payable at regular intervals, for [the wife’s] support from year to year, and continues only during the joint lives of the parties, or, in case of divorce from the bonds of matrimony, until the wife marries again. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McGaugh v. McGaugh
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.