Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 268 CONN 508 - State v. Long

State v. Long’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

96
cited by 96 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
August 2025
most recently cited

94 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 96 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2025 · most notably State v. McKenzie-Adams (2007), Harris v. Commissioner of Correction (2004)

94 state decisions

480200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Goldberg v. Kelly · Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. · Addington v. Texas · Plyler v. Doe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 96 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Rational basis review is satisfied so long as there is a plausible policy reason for the classification .... [I]t is irrelevant whether the conceivable basis for the challenged distinction actually motivated the legislature.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Standing is the legal right to set judicial machinery in motion. One cannot rightfully invoke the jurisdiction of the court unless he [or she] has, in an individual or representative capacity, some real interest in the cause of action, or a legal or equitable right, title or interest in the subject matter of the controversy.... When standing is put in issue, the question is whether the person whose standing is challenged is a proper party to request an adjudication of the issue....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[I]n general, as in any constitutional challenge to the validity of a statutory scheme, the [statutory scheme] is presumed constitutional . . . and [t]he burden is on the [party] attacking the legislative arrangement to negative every conceivable basis which might support it. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.