Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 268 F.1d 114 - Osley v. Adams

Osley v. Adams’s Empirical Analysis

268 F. 114 · 1920

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
December 1962
most recently cited

8 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 1962

8 federal appellate ·

2019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Greey v. Dockendorff · Greey v. Dockendorff · Adams v. Osley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““While it may be true that the plaintiff by introducing adversary parties as his witnesses in an equity cause in the United States courts, is as much bound by their testimony as in the case of other witnesses, yet this does not mean that he is bound by every statement or conclusion of such witness, nor does it mean that he may not show that the witness is in error.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.