Olin v. Kitzmiller’s Empirical Analysis
268 F. 348 · 1920
Citation profile
2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1986
2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
Relationships
Relies on McCray v. United States · United States v. Des Moines Navigation & Railway Co. · Calder v. Michigan ex rel. Attorney General · Stoppenback v. Multnomah County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ The Congress of the United States of America hereby consents to and ratifies the compact and agreement entered into between the States of. Oregon and Washington relative to regulating, protecting, and preserving, fish in the boundary waters of the Columbia River and other waters, which compact and agreement is contained in section twenty of chapter one hundred and eighty-eight of •the general laws of Oregon for nineteen hundred and fifteen, and section one hundred and sixteen, chapter thirty-one, of the session laws of Washington for nineteen hundred; and fifteen, and is as follows: “ 'All laws and regulations now existing, or which may be necessary for regulating, protecting, or preserving fish in the waters of the Columbia River, over which the States of Oregon and Washington have concurrent jurisdiction, or any other waters within either of said States, which would affect said concurrent jurisdiction, shall be made, changed, altered, and amended in whole or in part, only with the mutual consent and approbation of both States.' “ Nothing .herein contained shall be construed to affect the right of>the United States to regulate commerce, or the jurisdiction of the United States over navigable waters.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Olin v. Kitzmiller“shall be issued to any person who is not. a citizen of the United States”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Olin v. Kitzmiller
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.