Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

268 F.2d 76

Docket No. 12795.

Frances Schuster Schaffner v. John H. Bingler, Director of Internal Revenue

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued May 4, 1959.

Decided May 7, 1959.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1959-05-07

2 counsel of record

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 7421

Relies on Luckenbach Steamship Company v. United States · Mitchell v. Bekins Van & Storage Co. · Bessie Lasky and Jesse L. Lasky v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1959-05-07

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 1972

7 federal appellate · 1 district ·

90195919601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Leonard Shapiro, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.

George W. Beatty, Washington, D. C. (Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, A. F. Prescott, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Hubert I. Teitelbaum, U. S. Atty., Thomas J. Shannon, Asst. U. S. Atty., Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and STALEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Appellant seeks to enjoin the taxing authorities from collecting the tax due under a final decision of the Tax Court. The order of the Tax Court determining that appellant was liable for the income taxes involved was entered with the consent of appellant. No petition for review of that decision was ever filed. We think Section 7421 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S. C.A. § 7421, providing that no suit shall be maintained in any court to restrain the assessment or collection of any tax or transferee liability, is clearly applicable in this instance. And here where the jurisdiction of the Tax Court was properly invoked and its decision having become final, the district court has no jurisdiction to reopen that decision. Lasky v. Commissioner, 9 Cir., 1956, 235 F.2d 97, affirmed per curiam, 1957, 352 U.S. 1027, 77 S.Ct. 594, 1 L.Ed.2d 598; White's Will v. Commissioner, 3 Cir., 1944, 142 F.2d 746.

¶2

The order of the district court will be affirmed.

/268/f2d/76 · .json · Public domain