Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 268 F.2d 871 - Morgan Drive Away, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

Morgan Drive Away, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters’s Empirical Analysis

268 F.2d 871 · 1959

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
3
states following
July 2013
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently July 2013 · most notably 69 Cal. 2d 713 - Consolidated Theatres, Inc. v. Theatrical Stage Employees Union, Local 16 (1968), Berger v. Iron Workers Reinforced Rodmen Local 201 (1988)

9 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

1001959196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · United Mine Workers of America v. Coronado Coal Co · United Constructions Workers v. Haislip Baking Co. · Higgins v. Shenango Pottery Co. · Hardy v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As we see it, the gravamen of Pineapple’s complaint as submitted to the jury on the individuals was that they violated Section 303 of the Labor-Management Relations Act. That is not to say that the act created any new liability as against individuals. Rather it is a belief that individuals whose conduct meets the tests of Section 303 undoubtedly offend the common law of the state of Oregon ... and we think the Labor-Management Act did not abolish by implication the common law tort liability of individuals. Id. at 883.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““ ‘ * * * nowhere in the Constitution of the International Union is there any authority granted to the official or representative of any affiliated local union, Joint Council, State or area Conference, with the exception of the Chairman of area conferences, [sic] to hold himself out to be an official, representative, or agent of the International Union.’ * * *””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Where [the], local labor organizations, affiliated with an international parent union, are autonomous associations, service of process upon their officers or agents is not service ‘upon an officer or agent’ of the international within the meaning of Section 301 (d), 29 U.S.C.A. § 185 .” Id. at 877 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.