Buchner v. United States

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Oct. 23, 1958.

Decided Oct. 30, 1958.

Petition for Rehearing In Banc Denied Nov. 24, 1958.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1958-10-30

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1958-10-30

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 1995

5 federal appellate ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Mr. John R. Fitzpatrick, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Edward J. Lynch, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant.

¶2Mr. Walter J. Bonner, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U. S. Atty., and Carl W. Belcher, Asst. U. S. Atty., were on the brief, for appellee. Mr. Alfred Hantman, Asst. U. S. Atty., also entered an appearance for appellee.

¶3Before Edgerton, Danaher, and Burger, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This appeal is from a conviction and sentence for violations of the District of Columbia gambling laws. We find no error.

¶6Affirmed.

¶7Circuit Judge Burger would dismiss the appeal as frivolous.

Download

Copy

Embed on your site

Hover to preview · click to copy the code

Search Wikipedia →

Court

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Judge

PER CURIAM.
By the court
Read opinion →

Counsel

Mr. John R. Fitzpatrick, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Edward J. Lynch, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. Walter J. Bonner, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U. S. Atty., and Carl W. Belcher, Asst. U. S. Atty., were on the brief, for appellee. Mr. Alfred Hantman, Asst. U. S. Atty., also entered an appearance for appellee.

In the law dictionary

Defined terms used in this case

gambling