Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 268 F.3d 1257 - Suntrust Bank v. Houghton Mifflin Company

Suntrust Bank v. Houghton Mifflin Company’s Empirical Analysis

268 F.3d 1257 · 2001

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
May 2023
most recently cited

22 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 68 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2023 · most notably Ty, Inc. v. Publications International Ltd. (2002), Latimer v. Roaring Toyz, Inc. (2010)

22 federal appellate ·

340200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co. · Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises · Sony Corporation of America v. Universal City Studios Inc · Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. · Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) a substantial likelihood of success on the merits; (2) a substantial threat of irreparable injury; (3) that the threatened injury to the plaintiff outweighs the potential harm to the defendant; and (4) that the injunction will not disserve the public interest.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[T]he public interest is always served in promoting First Amendment values.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “For purposes of our fair-use analysis, we will treat a work as a parody if its aim is to comment upon or criticize a prior work by appropriating elements of the original in creating a new artistic, as opposed to scholarly or journalistic, work. Under this definition, the parodie character-of TWDG is clear. TWDG is not a general commentary upon the Civil-War-era American South, but a specific criticism of and rejoinder to the depiction of slavery and the relationships between blacks and whites in GWTW.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.