¶1 Robert D. Brooks appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brooks v. Golden, No. 6:06-cv-01234, 2007 WL 2688603 (D.S.C. Sept. 11, 2007). We deny Brooks’ motions for appointment of counsel and to file an amended complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in *218 the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶2 AFFIRMED.