268 F. Supp. 2d 46 - Bryson v. Gere’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
11 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 9 U.S.C. § 1 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 10 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 11 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 9
Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co. · Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Allen v. McCurry · Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“First, the same issue now being raised must have been contested by the parties and submitted for judicial determination in the prior case. Second, the issue must have been actually and necessarily determined by a court of competent jurisdiction in that prior case. Third, preclusion in the second case must not work a basic unfairness to the party bound by the first determination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“would not affect its application in this case.” Id. Plaintiff had “ample opportunity” to argue that the statute of limitations should have been waived during the litigation of his initial claim;”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.