Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 268 Ga. 196 - Smith v. State

Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
3
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably 237 Ga. App. 274 - Parrish v. State (1999), Bishop v. State (1997)

37 state decisions

1401997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. State · Renner v. State · Johnson v. State · Harrell v. State · Sanders v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[e]vidence of past physical abuse is admissible for the limited purpose of illustrating that [the] defendant had a reasonable belief in the imminence of additional physical abuse at the hands of the victim and that, therefore, she was presently justified in acting in self-defense'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In this state, the battered person syndrome is not a separate defense and (evidence supporting this syndrome) is admissible only to assist the jury in evaluating a defendant's claim of self-defense”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “In a prosecution for murder or manslaughter, if a defendant raises as a defense a justification provided by subsection (a) of this Code section [defense of self or others], the defendant, in order to establish the defendant's reasonable belief that the use of force or deadly force was immediately necessary, may be permitted to offer: (1) Relevant evidence that the defendant had been the victim of acts of family violence or child abuse committed by the deceased , as such acts are described in Code Sections 19-13-1 and 19-15-1, respectively; and (2) Relevant expert testimony regarding the condition of the mind of the defendant at the time of the offense, including those relevant facts and circumstances relating to the family violence or child abuse that are the bases of the expert's opinion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.