Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 268 Ga. 44 - Campbell v. State

Campbell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently March 2019

19 state decisions

100199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fleming v. Zant · Knight v. State · Ortiz v. State · Paras v. State · Barksdale v. Ricketts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Traditionally, it is the task of the legislature, not the courts, to define crimes and set the range of sentences. (Cits.) The legislature’s choice of sentence is insulated from judicial review unless it is wholly irrational or so grossly disproportionate to the severity of the crime that it constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.” [Cits.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Where a criminal statute does not discriminate on racial grounds or against a suspect class, equal protection and due process concerns are satisfied if the statute bears a ‘reasonable relation to a proper legislative purpose’ and is ‘neither arbitrary nor discriminatory.’ (Cits.)” [Cit.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “was introduced to make truth in sentencing a reality, by ensuring that upon the conviction for a serious violent felony, the offender will serve the full sentence ordered by the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.