DeYoung v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 151 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 156 later decisions — most recently December 2019 · most notably Vergara v. State (2008), Pace v. State (1999)
4 federal appellate · 151 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Schmerber v. State of California · Witherspoon v. Illinois · Wainwright v. Witt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 156 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The magistrate’s task in determining if probable cause exists to issue a search warrant is simply to make a practical, common-sense decision whether, given all the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before him, including the “veracity” and “basis of knowledge” of persons supplying hearsay information, there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.”
15 later decisions quote this exact passage““The fact that [King] and his present counsel now disagree with the difficult decisions regarding trial tactics and strategy made by trial counsel does not require a finding that [King] received representation amounting to ineffective assistance of counsel.” [Cit.]”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Boseman v. State · Cook v. State“determin[ing] if the magistrate had a `substantial basis' for concluding that probable cause existed to issue the search warrant[,]”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.