268 Ga. App. 390 - In Re Herring’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In Re Irvin · 230 Ga. App. 283 - In Re Brant · 178 Ga. App. 454 - In Re Michael Edward Bergin · 259 Ga. App. 5 - In Re Willis · 258 Ga. App. 725 - In Re Omole
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he judge before whom the allegedly contemptuous conduct occurred is not a 'party' to appellate review of a contempt finding, as is reflected in the style of a contempt case before this Court, i.e., 'In re' and the name of the alleged contemnor. Accordingly, no appellate appearance by the [judge who entered the contempt order] is authorized.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Contempt of court, in its broad sense, means disregard for or disobedience of the order or command of the court; this also includes the interruption of court proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.