Powell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2009
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anders v. California · Brandon v. State · 154 Ind. App. 603 - Dixon v. State · State Ex Rel. Van Natta v. Rising · Powell v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(1) no timely and adequate motion to correct error was filed for the defendant; “(2) the failure to file a timely motion to correct error was not due to the fault of the defendant; and “(3) the defendant has been diligent in requesting permission to file a belated motion to correct error under this rule.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Zellers v. State“[the determination as to whether or not [a post-conviction] appeal should be taken has been held to be a matter for judicial determination and not a matter to be delegated to counsel”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mosley v. State“has not permitted the State Public Defender to withdraw from appeals by filing Anders v. California briefs”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mosley v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.