Oricks v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Taylor v. Louisiana · Maldonado v. State · Rawlins v. State of Georgia · United States v. John E. Test, Francis R. Salazar v. United States of America, United States of America v. Enrique Sandoval Chavez, United States of America v. Cameron David Bishop · Ruetz v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"(The interest of appellant which the Sixth Amendment protects is that identifiable segments of the population not be excluded, not that any particular group be represented."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Thompkins v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.