Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 268 Ind. 83 - Lindley v. State

Lindley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
August 2006
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently August 2006 · most notably Lindley v. State (1981), Seymour National Bank v. State (1981)

3 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

1401978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. Alaska · Blackburn v. State · Chatman v. State · King v. State · Lockridge v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When the indictment for first degree murder was returned by the grand jury, jurisdiction over the matter immediately vested in the criminal division of the Lake Superior Court. At the same time the juvenile division was immediately divested of jurisdiction. The juvenile court subsequently did the only thing which by law it could do it dismissed the petition for delinquency. We therefore hold there was no error in the failure to hold a waiver hearing.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]n cases of statutory interpretation this Court must give consideration to the consistency of all sections and to the logical meaning of the language. A statute which is specific and unambiguous must be held to its plain meaning.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.