Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 268 Ind. 97 - Blythe v. State

Blythe v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
August 2006
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently August 2006

3 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

801978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Martin v. State · Lockridge v. State · Dull v. State · Gaunt v. Board of Appeals of Methuen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[Cjonsiderations for both judicial resources and double jeopardy proscriptions dictate that a court should have jurisdiction to impose sentence upon a verdict of guilty, as to any necessarily lesser-included offense or any lesser degree of the offense for which the defendant was lawfully charged and tried . . . . In the case before us, however, the offense for which the defendant was sentenced was not an offense of lesser degree or one necessarily included in the offense charged. We have previously held that second degree murder is not an offense necessarily included in a charge of felony murder. Dull v. State, (1961) 242 Ind. 633 , 180 N.E.2d 523 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “waive jurisdiction and order such child held for trial ... [in] the court which would have jurisdiction of such offense if committed by an adult.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.