State v. Martinez’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
July 2011
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Morissette v. United States · Staples v. United States · United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc. · Texas v. New Mexico · State v. Lewis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A statute is presumed constitutional and all doubts must be resolved in favor of its validity. A statute must clearly violate the constitution before it may be struck down. This court not only has the authority, but also the duty, to construe a statute in such a manner that it is constitutional if the same can be done within the apparent intent of the legislature in passing the statute.” State v. Martinez, 268 Kan. 21, 23 , 988 P.2d 735 (1999).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Van Hoet
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.