Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 268 Kan. 264 - State v. Sampsel

State v. Sampsel’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Todd v. Kelly · State v. Moncla · State v. Fike · State v. Gonzales · State v. Gideon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A trial court abuses its discretion when no reasonable person would take the view adopted by it, when the judicial action is based on an error of law, or when the judicial action is based on an error of fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “real, not imagined; something with substance and not ephemeral,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.