Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 268 Kan. 764 - State v. Bell

State v. Bell’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 2024

16 state decisions

100200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Gregory · State v. Sherry · State v. Pioletti · State v. Green · Mortimer v. Evans

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] preliminary hearing judge does not pass on 10 credibility, and, when the evidence conflicts, the judge must accept the version of the testimony most favorable to the State.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.