Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 268 Md. 110 - Baltimore County v. Letke

Baltimore County v. Letke’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2011
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 2011

6 state decisions

2019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The County, for the first time on appeal, attempted to raise the questions in regard to possible indefiniteness of the terms of the contract and that Mr. Redmond did not have authority to bind the County to the contract. These points not having been raised or decided below will not be considered by ns on appeal. Maryland Rule 885.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.