Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 268 N.C. 249 - State v. Frazier

State v. Frazier’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
2
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably State v. Eppley (1972), State v. Howard (1968)

32 state decisions

140196619701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Stephens · Linkous v. Millner · Conley Ex Rel. Conley v. Pearce-Young-Angel Co. · Hoke v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp. · State v. Orr

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In 52 C.J.S., Larceny § 107(b), the author, in discussing the significance of proof of possession by the accused of recently stolen property, says: ‘Possession may be personal and exclusive, although it is the joint possession of two or more persons, if they are shown to have acted in concert, or to have been particeps criminis, the possession of one participant being the possession of all.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In our view, the unlawful and unexplained occupancy and use of Morton’s Dodge by Frazier and Givens under the circumstances disclosed by the evidence, and the precipitous flight of both defendants when approached by the officers, was sufficient to permit and to support a finding by the jury that the Dodge was in the joint possession of Frazier and Givens.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.