State v. Baugh’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 1978
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If defendant believes that the punishment imposed is unduly severe in fact, his recourse is to seek action by the' Board of Paroles or other exercise of the power of executive clemency.” State v. Baugh, 268 N.C. 294, 295 , 150 S.E. 2d 437 (1966) ; State v. Stewart, supra, at 252.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.