Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 268 N.J. Super. 553 - State v. Setzer

268 N.J. Super. 553 - State v. Setzer’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
March 2009
most recently cited

30 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. Zerbst · State v. Johnson · Musser v. States · Newland v. Georgia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “clearly and repeatedly instructed the jury that it was to consider the credibility of all of the testimony which included the testimony as to defendant's statement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “trial court's omission of the Hampton instruction in this instance was ... not `clearly capable of producing an unjust result.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a vigorous and forceful presentation of the State's case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.