State v. Paniagua’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"(1) The credibility of a witness may be attacked or supported by evidence in the form of opinion or reputation, but: "(a) The evidence may refer only to character for truthfulness or untruthfulness; and "(b) Evidence of truthful character is admissible only after the character of the witness for truthfulness has been attacked by opinion or reputation evidence or otherwise. "(2) Specific instances of the conduct of a witness, for the purpose of attacking or supporting the credibility of the witness, other than conviction of crime as provided in [ OEC 609 ], may not be proved by extrinsic evidence. Further, such specific instances of conduct may not, even if probative of truthfulness or untruthfulness, be inquired into on cross-examination of the witness."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 290 Or. App. 272 - State v. Mackey

2. “An abuse of discretion on an evidentiary ruling by a trial court occurs when the court's ruling exceeds the range of all legally correct discretionary choices. In that context, 'discretion' refers to the authority of the trial court to choose among several legally correct outcomes.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 290 Or. App. 272 - State v. Mackey

3. “[e]vidence of a person's character is not admissible for the purpose of proving that the person acted in conformity therewith on a particular occasion[.]”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 290 Or. App. 272 - State v. Mackey