Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 268 Pa. Super. 168 - Commonwealth v. Boerner

268 Pa. Super. 168 - Commonwealth v. Boerner’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
2
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently December 2010 · most notably Commonwealth v. Lutz (1985), 280 Pa. Super. 20 - Commonwealth v. Benson (1980)

43 state decisions

36019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 247 Pa. Super. 99 - Commonwealth v. Kindness · Miller v. Exeter Borough · Commonwealth v. Sweet · Smart, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Secondly appellant argues that the breathalyzer machine had, on the date of his test, not yet obtained Department of Health certification. Act of 1976, June 17, supra, 75 Pa.C.S. § 1547(c). This statute mandating certification became effective one day prior to the instant case. The particular machine used had been approved by the Department of Transportation, for use under the former legislation. Act of 1959, April 29, P.L. 58, 75 P.S. § 624.1. And it received current Health Department certification subsequent to the instant use. Thus it is clear that it was error to have admitted the breathalyzer results, but we hold such error harmless in light of the overwhelming testimonial evidence of appellant’s intoxication, infra.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.