Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 268 Pa. Super. 253 - Exner v. Exner

268 Pa. Super. 253 - Exner v. Exner’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
November 2005
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently November 2005 · most notably 318 Pa. Super. 225 - Day v. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft (1983), Allegheny International, Inc. v. Allegheny Ludlum Steel Corp. (1994)

2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

1701979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schubach v. Silver · McCarthy v. Township of McCandless · State Hospital for Criminal Insane v. Consolidated Water Supply Co. · 258 Pa. Super. 519 - Lebeau v. Lebeau · 246 Pa. Super. 455 - Jenkins v. Jenkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he complaint in equity recited all prior defaults, including those alleged in the prior assumpsit actions ... [and thus,] the causes of action alleged in the consolidated assumpsit actions were included among the breaches of contract averred and decided in the equity action.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Because an adjudication in equity is as conclusive as a judgment at law ... it is of no consequence that the earlier suit was brought in equity and the later action at law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.