Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 268 So. 2d 166 - Fernandez v. Cunningham

268 So. 2d 166 - Fernandez v. Cunningham’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
August 2002
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently August 2002

7 state decisions

401972198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gory Roofing Tile Manufacturing, Inc. v. Davison · Halstead v. Florence Citrus Growers Assn. · 126 So. 2d 305 - Emile v. First National Bank of Miami · Bolles v. O'Brien · 148 So. 2d 53 - Harrison v. McCourtney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * * * * "In Holl v. Talcott, Fla. 1966, 191 So.2d 40, 46-47 , the Supreme Court stated that the principle which is applied on hearing on motion for summary judgment, of strict reading of the papers of a movant and liberal reading and construction of the papers of the opposing party, should be applied also in considering a motion, made by petition for a rehearing or to vacate a summary judgment, for the court to receive new affidavit evidence which could be material to the outcome." * * * * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.